Thanks, : )
Thanks, : )
Everything in https://github.com/RocketChat/Rocket.Chat is 100% Open Source and MIT Licensed.
and all of its dependencies?
With the number of dependencies, it’s hard to say exactly. Whilst all the top level dependencies are, it’s simply too hard to tell, and I don’t want to say “yes” because it might be the case that a dependency of a dependency of a dependency might have a closed source component. But that’s doubtful.
Why do you ask? The Rocket.Chat project is MIT licensed so you may do with it what you wish.
Thanks for the reply. The reason I ask is because my org and I don’t want to distribute or use non-free software.
I don’t want to distribute or use non-free software.
Well, Rocket.Chat is MIT licensed, so it’s 100% free. I wouldn’t be concerned about the dependencies.
I don’t think you can ever completely eliminate the possibility of having a closed source tool enter the application-chain. To get a real answer you’d need to coordinate with 1000’s of package maintainers and it would be almost impossible.
Do you think that if any of your dependencies were discovered to be non-free that Rocket.Would chat try to correct that?
I cant give you an answer officially, I’m just a community volunteer.
But I’m sure that if this was brought up, and there was a suitable open source replacement then anyone could submit a Pull Request to have the module in question changed/fixed/removed.
The MIT license is one of the most liberal OSS licenses there is, If you are unfamiliar with it you can have a look here - https://tldrlegal.com/license/mit-license#summary
I’m 99.9% sure that there’s nothing distributed, even at a module level that would be considered ‘non free’ as the JS package ecosystem is essentially all open source any way.