# Support for installation in subdirectory will be discontinued

**URL:** <https://forums.rocket.chat/t/support-for-installation-in-subdirectory-will-be-discontinued/6371>\
**Category:** Announcements\
**Created:** [April 3, 2020, 3:02am UTC](https://forums.rocket.chat/t/support-for-installation-in-subdirectory-will-be-discontinued/6371 "2020-04-03T03:02:19Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jgribonvald](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/d78d45/32.png) [@jgribonvald](https://forums.rocket.chat/u/jgribonvald)\
**Post date:** [April 9, 2020, 4:22pm UTC](https://forums.rocket.chat/t/support-for-installation-in-subdirectory-will-be-discontinued/6371/14 "2020-04-09T16:22:08Z")

</div>

> Webhost that limits you this way are not competitive and dying fast. I would be surprised if you cannot find a more flexible web hosting firm at a lower cost. Which webhost are you with that still have such restriction?

I’m not using a such host, but I know it exist as I already encounter it and changed due to that restriction 😉 And it’s really low cost host.  
After on my side we have our own servers, and we are deploying apps by subdirectories, but for several server names as we link a user auth on a domain it’s more easy to keep him on the good server name. But we can tune our servers and apps for a such case with some development for our customization needs, even if we prefer to avoid such cost.

For the server name management part I will follow your advice 😉

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.rocket.chat/t/support-for-installation-in-subdirectory-will-be-discontinued/6371)._